|
|
About
'Blogs
Read
Syndicate
Resumes
Academia
Powered by
|
October 31, 2006ACS Education AmusementI spent some time on the phone with ACS today, and got some amusing information on my account. I feel like I'm *obligated* to share. My address was updated to a place that I have never lived before sometime in last few months. Odd. I finally found out how to reach their Skiptrace department ( 1-800-508-1543 is the direct line, no hold times, oh so much fun ). My address was updated automagically when my name showed up as being forwarded to another address by the US Postal Service. Reasonable enough, except that I never had my address forwarded there. I asked what the source ("old") address of the mail forward was, and more particularly if it had matched their address on file at the time, but the skiptrace folks became evasive. I have a strong suspicion that there was no verification (even if there was, anybody can get anybody else' address forwarded at the post office fairly painlessly). I attempted to explain how this is a security flaw to the skiptrace folk, which didn't work. I wonder what would happen if someone were to call up the department, find out a skiptrace worker's full name, and have that person's address forwarded someplace else? I suppose it would only work if the employee had their loans serviced by ACS (which might actually be likely?). But it would certainly get the point across...
Posted by reid at 03:51 PM
| Comments (0)
October 21, 2006Election Information Sharing ReduxJudge Popeo Responds: Dear Reid: It's interesting to note that I have received four more flyers from candidates since applying for my absentee ballot. I received them all before I received my actual ballot (which finally arrived yesterday). It's more interesting to note that every flyer I received is from a republican candidate. I am registered as a New York state Green...
Posted by reid at 11:32 AM
| Comments (0)
October 19, 2006Voting PrivacyIf you haven't figured it out by now, I'm kind of a crusty curmudgeon when it comes to privacy. I've supplied a fake SSN numerous times on housing applications, given fake names and bogus SSNs to my utility companies (those that will accept fakes, anyway...it's amusing that SDG&E in San Diego does not check for valid name/SSN match [illegal immigrants?] and yet Niagara Mohawk in Canada does), and even purchased my co-op membership under a name other than mine. I've found it a bit disturbing, then, that several weeks after filing for an absentee ballot in Onondaga County, New York, I am now receiving advertising from political candidates on the roster at my absentee address. Could it be that Onondaga County sold or even gave my temporary postal address to political candidates? This seems so backwards. I've been trying to rationalize how how Judge Popeo obtained my current address. Nothing aside from getting it from the absentee ballot system makes sense. If he obtained it from the County board of elections in this manner, is that right? Is it our election board's right to sell or even give this information away? I certainly saw nothing indicating that my signature was authorizing the retelling of my private information to a third party. Maybe going to Toorcon a few weeks ago was a bad idea... In any case, I decided to write Judge Popeo a letter: Dear Judge Popeo - I cannot wait to see what response I receive, if any.
Posted by reid at 10:47 PM
| Comments (0)
October 10, 2006ACS Sucks ReduxACS is a really miserable student loan company that happens to be responsible for my student loan. They're hilarious. The last issue I had with them was in 2003, when they reported me delinquent in student loan repayment for 6 months (I was a graduate student at the time). It took me many months, several hundred dollars, and a lawyer to straighten things out. When I moved to California, I updated my address in their records. I never received a notification with them. I logged in to the website again, and found that the address was completely wrong, pointing to a house just outside of Hoboken, NJ. I called to update the address (and dispute that I owe payment...I have paper from them saying that I am prepaid through the end of the year, they tacked on late fees and said I owed them payments since August as of now...helpful that the address they have for me is wrong so I could not receive the notices). I inquired how my address was updated, and was told by Latoya, "The information is verified from a database by our security department." I asked if I could talk to the security department, she said, "No, but they verify the information so it's okay." I insisted that I had never been contacted to verify the incorrect information, that I never lived anywhere near the address, etc. "Well, the information is in a database, so it's okay." I'm not sure that Latoya understands English, or understands the issue at hand (identity theft?). This afternoon, I walk to the Navy Federal Credit Union to consolidate my loan.
Posted by reid at 11:51 AM
| Comments (2)
October 05, 2006On HastertA play on The Comedian (Bill Hicks), with apologies of Jesse Helms: "Boy Mark Foley is another great one, isn't he? Just another little fevered ego tainting our collective unconscious. Cuz y'know, anyone that far to the right has a very deep and dark secret. You do know that, right? I'm an armchair fuckin' psychologist, but...You know when Mark Foley dies, he's gonna commit suicide, first of all, in a washtub out back underneath a pecan tree. He's gonna slash his wrists and he's gonna write in blood, 'I've been a very bad boy.'" "But you know they're gonna find the skins of young children drying in his attic. Swarms of horseflies going in and out of the eaves and on CNN over and over his wife going, 'I always wondered about Mark's collection of little shoes...'" "Anyone that far to the right is hiding a deep, dark secret." I'm finding the whole Hastert thing fascinating. And it brought to my attention one of the fighting dems. I wonder if the Power of the Internet could get John Laesch the David spot in David vs. Goliath? If you have a few bucks to kick around, why not give it a shot? On another note, ever notice that the Democrats' official page is hosted at a .org, and the republicans is hosted at a .com? Funny.
Posted by reid at 03:19 PM
| Comments (0)
October 01, 2006Like a Moth to the MoonEvery couple of years I have a day where I 'wake up', or gain a higher level of understanding of the stakes to what it is that I'm up to at the present. This weekend was one such time.
This weekend, I went to Toorcon, a little itty bitty west coast computer security conference that annually holds a lot of the talks from DefCon, but without the oppressive crowds, the Vegas lights, nor the latchers-on. I'd say it's about my speed. There are a lot of kooks in the computer security field, and they're the first to admit that they're kooks. My kind of people. I came to remember a time when I was having fun breaking systems, instead of doing the impossible task of trying to fix them. I became interested in computer security after I rooted myself -- I wrote a simple helpdesk software that took email, used procmail and a perl script to stuff it into a database, and then used a web interface to read it and allowed users to "take" emails for themselves, out of the untaken email list. I worked for CIT at the time, and the tool was to be used by our whole group to track helpdesk email. Something strange happened while testing. I was forward-copying all of the normal helpdesk email from my mail account to my script, just for testing. One of the emails only got partially entered. Like, the data just got cut off. Oddly, it happened at a semicolon. Curious, did that actually work? I sent an email with "hi;drop table foo;" as the body, and sent it. My database disappeared. "Wow, this is fucking cool!" A few weeks later, I started working for the Center for Systems Assurance at the university, amazed at my newfound powers of examination. Since then, I've been working on the seemingly impossible task of making toaster ovens out of computers, so that users can't send any data they're not supposed not, and worse so that really clever evil users can't send any data they're not supposed to. It's an impossible task, or at least an intractable one. Nobody is patient enough to make a toaster oven for our users (which is what we really need, if we want to limit them to using toaster oven functions). I'm remembering why I want to go back to grad school -- it's a lot more fun to break the toaster than it is to make it. Modus tolens over modus ponens, which is great because that's what the scientific method is all about.
Posted by reid at 10:48 PM
| Comments (1)
|
Paris
USA
Berlin
Prague
Dresden
Archives
February 2008
December 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002
Search
About
|